klaude scrie:Alina diferenta e ca a ta e turbo a lui e compresor!Si sincer nu prea stiu care cai trag mai bine turbo sau compresor!Stie cineva?

Kompresor are avantajul ca nu pierde cuplu asa de mare la turatii ridicate. Dar la turatii joase nu prea sta bine. In schimb la turbo cand intre turbina pe la 1800 RPM rupe.
one last note, turbo is the mroe efficient since it doesn't infring on the engine's power, yet it needs "time" to have enough gases built up for a 100% functioning, which is termed as turbo lag, this si being eliminated with low pressure and sequential turbos
kompressors are power hungry, if i am not mistaken almost 200 bhp of the total power output of the merc 55K engine went into powering the supercharger itself, they stress an engine if not properly mated, although they are pretty responsive on low revs and only become really power hungry on higher revs